I recently watched through all of Evangelion and it made me think, “what was wrong with Anno? (the guy who created this masterpiece) also what did the characters’ lives have to do with him?” because it’s not uncommon for projection to appear in someone’s work, often called a “Mary Sue.”

These are my conclusions to what the different characters were, please feel free to put your own input in comments or messages.

Shinji: The question, the confusion, the curiosity and everything that anno believed to be wrong with himself.

Rei: The answer, the unknown, the finishing and end as well as everything that anno believed to be perfect or unattainable about or to himself.

Asuka: The known answer, the unwanted or textbook response, the psychologist in anno’s life, the life that he wished to never have to deal with

Kaworu: The epitome, the existential crisis, the realization of meaning that anno neither understood or even cared to understand

Kensuke: The intellect, the only grasp on the outside world that anno had contact with, the only learning capability that anno conciously held on to and the only way that anno decided was what he had to know to survive.

Toji: The true friend, the trials, the tribulations, the porcupine’s dilema as stated in anno’s earlier ramblings, the one he will end up hurting the most from being close to them.

Ritsuko: The mother, the woman, that which anno doesn’t understand but assumes that he’s not to understand as it is something for him to understand the male.

Misato: The lust, the desire, the pride, the sloth, the theif, the murderer, the glutton, the 7 cardinal sins, everything that anno wants out of the world that he sees as being too human or too primal for him to continue on with doing so.

Kaji: The male, the libido, what anno finds as the meaning behind what is manly and what men should do, what he should understand because he is male.

Gendo: The father, the hope for recognition, the abandonment root that probably fucked up anno the most.

and that’s pretty much it, for my work is done.

I just got done with recording gameplay footage of Darksiders for the PC for 16 hours and realized that I kind of suck at Darksiders when I am fatigued or depressed. I also kind of suck at puzzles when I am fatigued or depressed, maybe even tired.

At that moment, I deleted all of the footage because I realized that my review would last about two minutes and would comprise of this:

Darksiders is a good game that takes notes from devil may cry and legend of zelda. it’s a rather decent action-adventure style Apocalypse-genre game where you; the main character “War” of the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, have to seek revenge against the council that overlooks the universe. This game took me about 16 hours to beat and it left me with essentially one thing to say about it. “Darksiders: The accolades and shortcomings weigh exactly the same.” I AM KIT WITH THE CRITICAL QUESTION, BRINGING THE DARK INTO THE LIGHT FOR A BETTER LOOK. GOOD LUCK; HAVE FUN; DON’T DIE.
I then realized that The Critical Question should be about myself today. I realized that I have not been awake for a week and a half. I realized that the lithium that I had been given for my bipolar disorder might be simply making me sick, depressed, maybe even tired.
Just keep following your own life until I can work this lithium situation back out with my psychiatrist. I’ll be off of it tomorrow, but it may take a few days for it to leave my system and I’ll probably just post my next review with an actually interesting subject in the new year.
Thanks for sticking around,
-Kit